Alex Ross links to me anew as "the renegade harpist". Uneducated harpist, more like, I had to look "renegade" up in the dictionary. Anyway, it's nice finally to give that impression. At school the cool kids weren't very into harp music.
Punkish iconoclast that I am, here's one for the jazzers. I'm listening to Alice Coltrane's India-inspired, jazz-harp recordings ('Turiya and Ramakrishna', 'Shiva-Loka', etc).
I'm not convinced by the harp. Glissandos on a modal pedal setting are a good jazz effect, but here they're pretty much the only effect. I wouldn't mind if they were decorative - a glissando's role in life - but they create the solo line.
Obviously, if the music is good, it doesn't matter to what extent one instrument is used or not. But the tracks where Coltrane plays piano are stratospherically superior ('I want to see you'; 'Gospel Trane'): imaginative solos with good use of pause, clear and exciting rhythmic variety and, because she's not just playing whole-tone glissandos, melodic interest.
Am I missing something here? Only glissandos on every harp track? Coltrane's a great artist and can do what she likes, and after all, my own jazz harp "skills" so far extend to some seventh chords and the odd cadence with a secondary dominant. Still, if you're interested in jazz harp, do at least compare this album with something like Dorothy Ashby's In A Minor Groove.