there are more things in heaven and earth, Horatio
Writing about music is like playing a repertoire warhorse.
Here's the gist of what I mean.
Most people can write and most harpists play the Faure Impromptu, arguably the most important work in our repertoire. And the Faure is mostly massacred and similarly it's amazing what you often find in books. I'm forever reading so-called musicology and thinking: what are you trying to say? where is your argument? I know it modulates to the subdominant minor. I can read music. I want to know what the effect of that modulation is, how it influences the character of the whole, and why it is beautiful and lovely.
Familiarity breeds contempt, perhaps: we underestimate the Impromptu because we hear it (badly) so often, and we all have to write from time to time. It is precisely this familiarity that warns us to take care.
A piece becomes the most famous in the repertoire for a reason, and is rarely a cinch to pull off. Well-crafted, writing is vital to that holy grail of musical survival, accessibility. Entertaining, eloqent words help us hear and to understand, even without years of expensive middle-class music lessons. If our programmes, journals, and histories are convoluted and humourless, pitched too low or too high, and seasoned liberally with lamentations about the death of classical music, well, are you suprised?
Classical music needs more vigorous, grandly powerful writing. In such writing, beautifully demonstrated by some illustrious members of the blogosphere, intellectual rigour and a lyrical way with words justify and enhance the emotional range, humour and joie-de-vivre without which we have no music, and so without which we can have no truly useful talk about music.
It is a truism that a musical masterpiece cries out for a similar combination of facility, feeling, intellect, and joy, else it is nothing but roaring. Strangely though for something so obvious (perhaps I am slow of study), I have only just noticed. I have only just perceived how seriously to take the Faure Impromptu. And I have woken up to it because I went to work on it with, not just a very good musician, but a great artist. At the end of our afternoon together I felt so elated, not just because she had told me she was pleased: because what she brought to the music not only transformed the piece for me, but my whole level of musical understanding. I have an utterly transported view of phrasing, of tone quality, of the relationship of dynamics to one and other, about how to give every note something to say. If my arm fell off tomorrow and I never played the harp again, I would stay thankful every day I had that afternoon.
I think this is part of what defines an artist: once you hear them, you are immediately inspired, with astonishing clarity. What would it be like if we gave more thought to the artists among our writers, too?





