« May 2005 | Main | July 2005 »

part II

Here is the second part of my long Madrid post,ordered through Edward Steuermann´s 1964 Julliard Convocation Address.  If you haven´t already done so, read the first part, er, first.

Was die Mode frech geteilt

"For my feeling, you can reach another golden age of music (but not "business as usual") if your mind is able to embrace the entire realm of music, not only its externals;  if it inspires you to find the hidden resources and the understanding of the real values, disregarding the temporary slogans, disregarding the style (to quote Beethoven:   "Was die Mode frech geteilt" - what fashion brazenly destroyed);  if it drives you to find out what thoughts and expressions lie hidden behind complicated constructions, to learn also that there cannot be a valid meaning without construction and logic, and always try to help real creativity, knowing that your own future depends on it."

I love Beethoven even more than Britten (it is one of my life's ironies that Beethoven never wrote a note of harp music).  Like Britten, he is a rigorous virtuoso, and understands joy and sadness alike.  As I argued at the end of part I, to be an artist you have to have this enormous emotional palette, but also be able to speak with great clarity.  I can't think of a voice clearer than Beethoven's: sometimes overpowering rage, misery, violence, and sometimes almost unbearable sweetness. 

I always know if a performer is an artist or not by their clarity:  not articulation or projection or other technical details, but by how, if an artist, every note makes sense, tells a story.  Even if it is not how you would interpret the piece, you are convinced - not least because real artistry involves also intellectual care and logic, a close attention to the score and its context, recreative attention as well as creative inspiration.  After all, to speak well requires good grammar along with a natural way with words.

This honesty, and humility, are the outward signs of an artist's pure spirit.  Competitions, for example, are fraught with politics, and perhaps someone will progress to the second or third stage who should not have:  but, in my experience, if there is an artist competing, they will do well whatever political troubles.  What they have is not possible to argue against, and, no matter how crowded the music world becomes, there will always be room for them.

these power centres

"If you use your resources with open mind and open heart, you will be rewarded by finding new land, and, even if you are not yourselves what one calls "innovators", you will see the older music in a new light, you will infuse it with new life.  Music is an art which may age faster than other arts, possibly because of its overwhelming vitality and impressionability. In a painting, the power centres in a confined space circulate forever, but in music, which is created in time, these power centres lose themselves in infinity."

Along with disciplined logical recreative attention to a score, what is it that an artist brings to music creatively, that does comes from themselves alone? 

The emotional range I have already outlined, from joyful to desolate, and the ability to express complex feelings clearly, is what makes us human.  At the moment I am not an artist, only a good harpist, but a few times in my life I have given performances that are different from a normal polished rendition.  Before now, I have never been able to work out what it was that made everyone jump up and down (especially as in every case I could have played with fewer mistakes), but now I see that it is when you play with the most humanity, the most honesty and humility, that you can see across the river to where the artists are. 

And this is what you came here for

"If you want to understand art, you have to understand the world; in order to understand the world, you have to understand human beings;  then you will understand youselves, and that is the key to everything.  That will make playing, composing, dancing less an exhibition of unimportant skills in a society game, meeting with more or less approval, blindly climbing up the deceitful ladder of success, but an opening of your heart to the world and the world to your heart.  And that is what you came here for, this is what makes music one of the most sublime emanations of the human spirit, that is what makes it worthwhile to devote one's life to it.  Looking back on my own life, I recognize my good fortune in having had as my masters some real heroes of music."

Artistry is not available for everyone to take, but it always has to be learnt.  And we learn it, of course, not from books of exercises (although these are crucial too, and a poor thing it is, I think, if you do not acknowledge your first teachers in your later stratospheric biographies), but from artists themselves. 

Finally, because music is an heroic endeavour (that is, continual striving without any guarantee of success), young musicians need heroes.  Usually we put our teachers on pedestals. If the teacher is not a hero that costs us dear, and it is not their fault if we build them up to what they are not.  But if you are lucky enough to meet one of Steuermann's heroes of music, even if you have a bad lesson or an argument, you won't come crashing down, just as, an artist can play a wrong note, but it won't matter. 

"I once asked Schoenberg what he considered most important in a teacher, and he answered "To be trustworthy".  A teacher has to be believed: not only his occasional advices of technique and interpretation, which probably cannot always be infallible, but his whole personality, what he stands for." 

part I

David Bean has sent me an absolutely rocking Convocation Address his teacher, Edward Steuermann, gave at the Julliard in 1964.

Arrogantly I am going to use its perception, realism, humanity and spirit to order this long and two-part post.

Is it worth it?

"We must consider out decision as a kind of sacrifice, and in the back of the restless human mind will always lurk the treacherous question:  Was it worth it?  Is it worth it to be a musician nowadays?  We all here - composers, instrumentalists, singers, dancers - have one thing in common:  out of all the forces and instincts of our body and our mind we have chosen one organ to be our guide - the ear!  Nietzsche called the ear "the organ of fear", and fear is not a mean driving force in the adventures of the mind.  But it is still more:  out of the ambivalence of our instincts comes a counteracting force:  hope!  Perhaps music is just the magic to transform fear into hope.  I remember many years ago having to write something about "the music of the future" (there was a time when one believed in such things).  I ended with the sentence:  "Music is always music of the future", and I hope sincerely for you that you all feel the same way.  Otherwise, why make this choice?"

Almost nobody seems to think it a good idea to become a musician, yet our conservatoires, universities and the freelance arena are stuffed like never before.  Other professions long in training (doctors, lawyers) enjoy respect:  musicians often seem to bridge the social gap between street-sweepers and working girls.  Why do we bother, to work all hours without security, wealth or good living?  What keeps us at it, hiding from the taxman in dingy rented digs?

The adage knows we do it for love - and we do have to love what we do.  But it is not the sort of love cooked up by those who think we'll enjoy working for nothing or less for as long as they want us.  It is an ambiguous passion, real only, because it is not clear-cut.

The peacock who would be king 

"You are entering school not only in search of inspiration and ideas, but to learn as well all those thousands of skills our art requires.  How tempting it would be to reach out by spirit alone and try by inspiration and imagination to gain everything we need to express ourselves!  Tempting, but would it be successful?  It would be what is commonly called "amateurish".  The word sounds almost insulting here, but if you excuse my dialecticism and contradictions, is it really so bad?  After all, amare, to love, is the root of this word, and, as you know, love is "what makes the world go round.  And if the proudest professional does not have this little prefix ama- in his equipment, he might command everything that can be seen, heard, tasted, all the variety, the colours:  something like the plumage of the peacock, who probably would have been elected king of the birds if not for the one moment when he opened his beak and let us hear his voice.  This comparison, not too serious, of course, is supposed to show the complexity of musical life, its ambiguities, and the multitude of ways in our almost labyrinthine world."

As my friend and I finally arrived at our digs last week (we had a map, but the residence had been cut off it, sitting uncomfortably alongside five words of Spanish which did not include "where is...") we were greeted by a noise unheard outside Dante's ninth circle.  Because the bedrooms were being cleaned, all the harps had been shifted to the room downstairs:  but, unwilling to lose a moment's practice, everyone was still playing them, together.  Each contestant had to play louder and faster than the one before, to hear themselves and frighten the others, with the shaky intonation of 40-degree heat and simultaneously rendered Spohr fantasies. 

I hate Spohr, even on one harp ably tuned, and after all music involves listening to what you are doing, so I went outside to look at the mountains.  And call me inexperienced, but I think by the time you arrive at an international competition you should already know your repertoire.  You should warm up, do any necessary technical exercises, rehearse mentally and stay fresh for your big moment.  If you hammer the harp every minute you can, what are you doing except wearing your spirit away? 

Some of the contestants I heard, not yet twenty, are already old women.  They are worn out.  And this is the tightrope music teeters along, between discipline and relaxation, rigour and freedom.  Great artists align the wisdom of experience with the delight of a child. 

The most difficult music requires the performer to balance the careful and the carefree most exquisitely.  I have never found a piece more difficult than CPE Bach's G Major sonata, because of the tension between technically coping with the snappy, exact ornamentation, and using those ornaments to express delicate sensibility. 

Through a similar dialectic of feeling and intellect I love the music of Britten.  He knows, so well, Steuermann's complexity, ambiguity, and his clever, passionate music is the more moving because he perceives the real knottedness of things others cannot see.  Recurrently his music posits innocence and delight, cruelty and fear:  often a preoccupation with childhood, because it is as children we are most delighted and also sometimes most afraid.  And, virtuoso composer though Britten is, he also recognises how difficult it is to walk the wire at once across joy and pain.  In Death In Venice, as Michael Phaidon writes, "the danced games of Apollo are the trigger for the ensuing nightmare in which Aschenbach realises the conflict within him between an Apollonian love of beauty and a Dionysiac sensual passion, and that in its turn is the catalyst for the scene of his deepest humilation, when he allows the insinuating hotel barber to dye his hair and rouge his cheeks in a vain attempt at rejuvanation."

Uncertain and Obscure

"Having been asked so many times that fatal questions:  "Do you think I can, do you think I should become a musician?" - my answer remains the same, "Only if you love music so much that you can stand a life of adversities."  So many times repeated, today a banality, it still remains true;  although again, the definition of love is uncertain and obscure."

Our relationship with music is bittersweet, strong equally in highs and lows, and perhaps artistry is, to handle these genuinely conflicting sides and create sense and meaning out of the muddle.  Great art has many layers to it, but is also clear, and in its clarity it is beautiful, whether classic or romantic or avant-garde.

This is the middle of my long post.  I will finish for today with Oscar Wilde's The Selfish Giant

Every afternoon, as they were coming from school, the children used to go and play in the Giant's garden.

It was a large lovely garden, with soft green grass. Here and there over the grass stood beautiful flowers like stars, and there were twelve peach-trees that in the spring-time broke out into delicate blossoms of pink and pearl, and in the autumn bore rich fruit. The birds sat on the trees and sang so sweetly that the children used to stop their games in order to listen to them. "How happy we are here!" they cried to each other.

One day the Giant came back. He had been to visit his friend the Cornish ogre, and had stayed with him for seven years. After the seven years were over he had said all that he had to say, for his conversation was limited, and he determined to return to his own castle. When he arrived he saw the children playing in the garden.

"What are you doing here?" he cried in a very gruff voice, and the children ran away.

"My own garden is my own garden," said the Giant; "any one can understand that, and I will allow nobody to play in it but myself." So he built a high wall all round it, and put up a notice-board.

TRESPASSERS
WILL BE
PROSECUTED

He was a very selfish Giant.

The poor children had now nowhere to play. They tried to play on the road, but the road was very dusty and full of hard stones, and they did not like it. They used to wander round the high wall when their lessons were over, and talk about the beautiful garden inside. "How happy we were there," they said to each other.

Then the Spring came, and all over the country there were little blossoms and little birds. Only in the garden of the Selfish Giant it was still winter. The birds did not care to sing in it as there were no children, and the trees forgot to blossom. Once a beautiful flower put its head out from the grass, but when it saw the notice-board it was so sorry for the children that it slipped back into the ground again, and went off to sleep. The only people who were pleased were the Snow and the Frost. "Spring has forgotten this garden," they cried, "so we will live here all the year round." The Snow covered up the grass with her great white cloak, and the Frost painted all the trees silver. Then they invited the North Wind to stay with them, and he came. He was wrapped in furs, and he roared all day about the garden, and blew the chimney-pots down. "This is a delightful spot," he said, "we must ask the Hail on a visit." So the Hail came. Every day for three hours he rattled on the roof of the castle till he broke most of the slates, and then he ran round and round the garden as fast as he could go. He was dressed in grey, and his breath was like ice.

"I cannot understand why the Spring is so late in coming," said the Selfish Giant, as he sat at the window and looked out at his cold white garden; "I hope there will be a change in the weather."

But the Spring never came, nor the Summer. The Autumn gave golden fruit to every garden, but to the Giant's garden she gave none. "He is too selfish," she said. So it was always Winter there, and the North Wind, and the Hail, and the Frost, and the Snow danced about through the trees.

One morning the Giant was lying awake in bed when he heard some lovely music. It sounded so sweet to his ears that he thought it must be the King's musicians passing by. It was really only a little linnet singing outside his window, but it was so long since he had heard a bird sing in his garden that it seemed to him to be the most beautiful music in the world. Then the Hail stopped dancing over his head, and the North Wind ceased roaring, and a delicious perfume came to him through the open casement. "I believe the Spring has come at last," said the Giant; and he jumped out of bed and looked out.

What did he see?

He saw a most wonderful sight. Through a little hole in the wall the children had crept in, and they were sitting in the branches of the trees. In every tree that he could see there was a little child. And the trees were so glad to have the children back again that they had covered themselves with blossoms, and were waving their arms gently above the children's heads. The birds were flying about and twittering with delight, and the flowers were looking up through the green grass and laughing. It was a lovely scene, only in one corner it was still winter. It was the farthest corner of the garden, and in it was standing a little boy. He was so small that he could not reach up to the branches of the tree, and he was wandering all round it, crying bitterly. The poor tree was still quite covered with frost and snow, and the North Wind was blowing and roaring above it. "Climb up! little boy," said the Tree, and it bent its branches down as low as it could; but the boy was too tiny.

And the Giant's heart melted as he looked out. "How selfish I have been!" he said; "now I know why the Spring would not come here. I will put that poor little boy on the top of the tree, and then I will knock down the wall, and my garden shall be the children's playground for ever and ever." He was really very sorry for what he had done.

So he crept downstairs and opened the front door quite softly, and went out into the garden. But when the children saw him they were so frightened that they all ran away, and the garden became winter again. Only the little boy did not run, for his eyes were so full of tears that he did not see the Giant coming. And the Giant stole up behind him and took him gently in his hand, and put him up into the tree. And the tree broke at once into blossom, and the birds came and sang on it, and the little boy stretched out his two arms and flung them round the Giant's neck, and kissed him. And the other children, when they saw that the Giant was not wicked any longer, came running back, and with them came the Spring. "It is your garden now, little children," said the Giant, and he took a great axe and knocked down the wall. And when the people were going to market at twelve o'clock they found the Giant playing with the children in the most beautiful garden they had ever seen.

All day long they played, and in the evening they came to the Giant to bid him good-bye.

"But where is your little companion?" he said: "the boy I put into the tree." The Giant loved him the best because he had kissed him.

"We don't know," answered the children; "he has gone away."

"You must tell him to be sure and come here tomorrow," said the Giant. But the children said that they did not know where he lived, and had never seen him before; and the Giant felt very sad.

Every afternoon, when school was over, the children came and played with the Giant. But the little boy whom the Giant loved was never seen again. The Giant was very kind to all the children, yet he longed for his first little friend, and often spoke of him. "How I would like to see him!" he used to say.

Years went over, and the Giant grew very old and feeble. He could not play about any more, so he sat in a huge armchair, and watched the children at their games, and admired his garden. "I have many beautiful flowers," he said; "but the children are the most beautiful flowers of all."

One winter morning he looked out of his window as he was dressing. He did not hate the Winter now, for he knew that it was merely the Spring asleep, and that the flowers were resting.

Suddenly he rubbed his eyes in wonder, and looked and looked. It certainly was a marvellous sight. In the farthest corner of the garden was a tree quite covered with lovely white blossoms. Its branches were all golden, and silver fruit hung down from them, and underneath it stood the little boy he had loved.

Downstairs ran the Giant in great joy, and out into the garden. He hastened across the grass, and came near to the child. And when he came quite close his face grew red with anger, and he said, "Who hath dared to wound thee?" For on the palms of the child's hands were the prints of two nails, and the prints of two nails were on the little feet.

"Who hath dared to wound thee?" cried the Giant; "tell me, that I may take my big sword and slay him."

"Nay!" answered the child; "but these are the wounds of Love."

"Who art thou?" said the Giant, and a strange awe fell on him, and he knelt before the little child.

And the child smiled on the Giant, and said to him, "You let me play once in your garden, today you shall come with me to my garden, which is Paradise."

And when the children ran in that afternoon, they found the Giant lying dead under the tree, all covered with white blossoms.

"my friend Yeste, you are very famous and very rich, and so you should be, because you make wonderful weapons.  But you must also make them for any fool who happens along.  I am poor, and no one knows me in all the world except you and Inigo, but I do not have to suffer fools."

"You are an artist", Yeste said.

"No.  Not yet.  A craftsman only.  But I dream to be an artist.  I pray that someday - if I work with enough care, if I am very very lucky, I will make a weapon that is a work of art.  Call me an artist then, and I will answer."

William Goldman, The Princess Bride

so near...

As Tim-I-really-think-he-can-do-it-this-year-Henman knows too well, when you are performing at a high level, the tiniest details decide.  Here in Madrid, I have been placed 12th, about a mark off making it into the final 10 and 0.7 marks away from no.11.  The difference in marks in the top 20 has been so small, the jury wanted to put 15 through instead, but were unable to change the rules. 

As it´s my first big competition, I am more relieved not to be, for example, 35th (and to be recommended to try some other competitions), and oddly comforted that the level really has been high, as demonstrated by the hair´s-breadth of the marks and my own ears watching the other contestants.

Anyway those of us now on holiday in the sun trooped into the concert hall armed with notebooks, cushions, scores, bottles of water, cough sweets, sour expressions and all the other accessories that sustain the seriously critical audience.  And I am happy, because while I didn´t like everything I heard (and so much, after all, is a question of taste), I heard one performance where I learnt something new about how to perform myself, and one performance from a real artist.

She had a technique secure enough that you could forget about the harp and think only about the music;  musicianship at once feeling, rigorous and honest;  and the ability to change her style and personality according to the culture and tradition of the piece.  This is one of the best things about being a performer:  we are creative, but also recreative, putting our own stamp on music but also learning from it in return.  When you learn a new language, you discover opinions and ideas you never knew you had, because not everything can be translated directly.  This is the same, more beautiful.

on the road again

Phew! It's hot.  And it's even hotter in Madrid, where I'm going tomorrow until the first of July.

I'm not sure there are many cybercafes in the mountains near Madrid, although, for the next fortnight anyway, there sure are a lot of harp concerts.

when will I learn...

...to think before I speak?

As I played in the picturesque sunken garden today, a bird crapped on my harp.  He managed to do it right on the mechanism, which is tricky to clean.  So when I got inside, I said:

"Has anyone got any cotton buds? I'd like to clean the shit off my harp before it dries on."

It was only afterwards I remembered one should probably not use words like "shit" in Kensington Palace.

take the pledge

Tomtwang twang twang is laid low with a vomiting illness.  But never let it be said I am not dedicated: typing from my sickbed, to plug Tom's new site, Pledgebank

How it works is explained both in the bbc article and on the homepage, but it's an I-will-if-you-will internet initiative to pull together and get things done. 

Here's mine:  "I will take a friend to the orchestra at my expense, but only if 20 other people will too".

Here, happily, is a new tool to promote the solidarity and co-operation upon which musicians (and many others, indeed) depend. 

the other half

I am not entirely sure this is what Olympia Scarry means, but none the less I am cheered by Jessica Brinton's sharp observation in this interview, here:

"As we leave, she [Olympia] says: “My father is an artist, not a businessman, and I think it’s the most amazing thing, if you’re shy, to be able to express yourself through art.” I don’t tell her what I’m rather ungenerously thinking: that pursuing your art without worrying about selling it is, these days, mostly the preserve of the privileged."


quiztime 69

Regular readers will know twang twang twang loves quizzes (Tom gave up the other day when he found me filling in "Which Big Brother Housemate Are You?"). 
So many thanks to George for this :) :

The total number of books I own
.  Don't know.  But my mum has been asking when I am going to take them all out of her flat for some time.  They will have to stay there as our house is full of f***ing books.

2. The last book I boughtThe Cambridge Companion to Benjamin Britten. 

3. The last book I read. TS Eliot Complete Poems and Plays.

4. Five books that mean a lot to meThe Tempest;  King Lear;  T S Eliot & Larkin Collecteds, The Cider House Rules.

***

It's a nice quiz.  I've been inspired to write one of my own. 

O FORTUNA! TAKE FOUR BOOKS RANDOMLY FROM YOUR GROANING CASES.  APPLY THESE QUICK THREE QUESTIONS:  1) How does it start?  2)  What is the moral message, if any?  and 3)  What does it look like?.  Select the answer that most applies to you.  WHICH BOOK ARE YOU?

Here are mine:

1) In my beginning is my end.  I was:
a) in that seson on a day, / In Southwerk at the Tabard as I lay / Redy to wenden on my pilgrymage
b) up a mountain in Grasmere
c) behydde Adam hine, and his wif eac saw dyde, from Godes gesihthe onmiddan tham treowe neorxenawanges
d) Born, as my friends told me, at the City of Poictiers...from whence I was brought to England by my Parents, who fled for their Religion about the Year 1683, when the Protestants were Banish'd from France by the Cruelty of their Persecutors.

2) Virtue is its own reward
.  I am:
a) officially virtuous
b) definitely virtuous
c) heroically virtuous
d) not virtuous
(If all your books are virtuous/not virtuous, to be an intellectual and read cultured blogs you have to broaden your moral horizons. When I was 9, I was sitting with my father one Sunday afternoon reading the Sunday Times colour supplement, all about, as it happened, sexual inclination.  When I asked what paedo- and necro- philia were, my father simply explained calmly and factually, as all good academic parents do.  It was only once we'd also gone thorugh animals, dwarves, the elderly and wheelchairs that he looked over the Review to ask "what are you reading?")

3) Don't judge a book by its cover.   I am:
a) - fat
b) -  romantic
c) - incomprehensible
d) - slender

Mostly a)s:
You are The Riverside Chaucer

Mostly b)s:
Wordsworth's The Prelude

Mostly c)s:
A Guide To Old English

Mostly d)s:
Defoe's Roxanna

Now - what does that say more about?  oneself or one's collection?  How do we distinguish between ourselves and our books? th'immortal part of myself...

the moment of the rose and of the yew-tree

Working at Britten's Suite for Harp. I was seized by an urge to re-read T S Eliot's Four Quartets (generally my mid-practice urges have been more of a coffee/newspaper/staring out the window sort, but these days I am a cultured procrastinator). 

There is no direct connection between the Britten Suite and Four Quartets, but Britten and Eliot are both English intellectuals with great technical facility and heart-rending emotional power, and each informs the other. 

Four Quartets, as the title implies, uses the form of the string quartet.   Eliot is religious, searching for permanence, truth and eternity, but - great poet that he is - language alone is too slippery, too unreliable, too prosaic:  "Words strain, / Crack and sometimes break...Decay with imprecision, will not stay in place, / Will not stay still".  Like WH Auden, a religious poet must "select another form."

Most people who love music would agree it sings of worlds beyond the everyday:  Eliot would have us understand that it does so because of its form.  The string quartet, traditionally a strict and disciplined structure, suits Eliot's austere, mystical Christianity.  It is also cyclical, and the unity achieved by its recapitulations lifts the music beyond a dying fall. 

"Words move, music moves
Only in time;  but that which is only living
Can only die.  Words, after speech, reach
Into the silence.  Only by the form, the pattern,
Can words or music reach
The stillness, as a Chinese jar still
Moves perpetually in its stillness."

For Eliot, not himself a musician, the string quartet is a secondary metaphor for his religious belief in the dark night of the soul, when the old self dies to be spiritually reborn.   I am not one for dark nights of the soul, but I am a musician.  Suddenly I understand the poem in a way I could not when I was seventeen, reading it for the first time, dutifully noting the allusions to St John of the Cross. 

Music, like Eliot's faith, occupies a different time-zone to our measured evenings, mornings, afternoons.  It plays out in strict time, but can be returned to, heard again and discovered anew, and even within one rendition often is heard again and newly, thanks to structural expositions, developments and recapitulations.  This pattern of repetition and renewal is stronger than the superficial mutatis mutandis of ordinary life, although it is part of it:

"History may be servitude,
History may be freedom.  See, now they vanish,
The faces and places, with the self which, as it could, loved them,
To become renewed, transfigured, in another pattern."

The similarities between Eliot's religious sensibility and music-making are striking.  To perform a complex work, for example, needs different layers of time.  Ideally you learn it, put it aside for some months, return to it, practice everything in bizarre and laborious ways to ensure you don't forget it or that your technique does not desert you.  In the performance, you need to think only of the moment, but you have to have done all the groundwork in order to be free to do so:

"Here the impossible union
Of spheres of existence is actual,
Here the past and future
Are conquered, and reconciled,
Where action were otherwise movement
Of that which is only moved
And has in it no source of movement -
Driven by daemonic, chthonic
Powers.  And right action is freedom
From past and future also."

Each time you take up a piece again, your interpretation shifts: it is the same score, but always different, and as you come to new ideas, you necessarily kill off old ones.  Thus "every phrase and every sentence is an end and a beginning,/Every poem an epitaph." 

As in life, it is also in music that you cannot force real understanding;  you have to be ready.  Perhaps I have a younger musician friend, still learning what I have learnt:  that we never stop working, practicing, altering;  what is today's perfect performance is not tomorrow's; and to be depressed by the continual labour misunderstands the work, because as musicians that is part of who we are.  I have learnt that by studying for longer than my friend.  Then sometimes, of course, it is what happens to you personally that shifts your perspective.  Through my teenage job in an old peoples' home I have seen people die before, but when I watched my great-aunt die, she has been the first person to die who I have really loved, and I did not leave the hospital the same person.  This is Eliot's

"Midwinter spring...
Suspended in time, between pole and tropic.
When the short day is brightest, with frost and fire,
The brief sun flames the ice, on pond and ditches,
In windless cold that is the heart's heat,
Relfecting in a watery mirror
A glare that is blindness in the early afternoon."

[How strange it is, that she died on a bright cold day in the early afternoon, and her funeral saw a brief snowfall, like Eliot's "transitory blossom/Of snow, a bloom more sudden than that of summer, neither budding nor fading"].

From my great-aunt's death I learnt how to play Scarlatti's taut, bittersweet f minor sonata.  I miss her dreadfully;  I wish she hadn't died;  at the same time, I am grateful she was spared the final indignities of old age.  Conflicting feelings are often truer than those neatly ordered, and this is Scarlatti's essence too.

"any action
Is a step to the block, to the fire, down the sea's throat
Or to an illegible stone:  and that is where we start.
We die with the dying:
See, they depart, and we go with them.
We are born with the dead:
See, they return, and bring us with them.
The moment of the rose and of the yew-tree
Are of equal duration."

A great work of art makes you feel less alone.  In this long poem, how much there is for us musicians to keep close by.