It is one of the great ironies of my life, given he didn't write much harp music (fortunately, neither did Brahms, but that's another story), that Beethoven is my favourite composer.
I love this, from Jeremy Denk:
"The first time this happens, I think it is unarguably weird, as if,
again, the violinist were “stuck.” (So many times in a row!) But, it
turns out, Beethoven repeats these two affecting notes exactly four
times, making a kind of peculiar, but standard, four-bar phrase out of
nearly nothing, out of pure iteration. And then this four-bar idea
(nothing) becomes kind of the foundation of the development. (Castles
in the air.) So: what was excessive, bizarre, transgression, becomes
normative, becomes the rule. Beethoven founds a temporary grammar on
exception and paradox. The composer’s magic of getting the listener to
accept the bizarre or asymmetrical. And once the strange becomes
“normal,” then departures from the strange themselves become strange,
the Alice in Wonderland, upside-down, beautiful world is created.
Watching
this winding in and out of normality through the development, as we
play it each night, I do feel like what I imagine the children, say, in
Chronicles of Narnia feel stepping through the wardrobe, and the faun
in the forest says hello. A hush comes over me in each development,
each performance. Tightrope act: you don’t want to make a false move,
or the dream will vanish, but on the other hand, you must relax and let
the dream take you where it wishes. And dramas in Narnia reverberate
back and forth significantly to reality (the development, as
meditation, back to the exposition, music into life, etc.) … my touring
life against “real life,” the symbol against the event, the idea versus
the thing … how much does my immersion in the development of Op. 96
affect the way I live my so-called normal life? The children of Narnia
must leave the fantasyland behind in order to grow up."