Yikes. Scott Spiegelberg rightly suggested that if I'm going to post nice quotations about Blogging Being The Answer, better come up with some answers myself. I generally only have one thort ricocheting round at a time, and I used it up on the Britten post, but here goes.
I put Greg Sandow's post up because his recognition of classical music's diversity struck a chord. Some months ago I was encouraged to try and put together an overview of the current state of classical music in the UK. I haven't finished it, partly because in addition to surfing the internet I do play the harp for a living, but primarily because of the enormity of the task. As Sue Sturrock at the Royal College of Music wrote to me:
"Overarching questions such as this are not easily addressed by statistical
research because of sheer scale. We end up, as you say, with what seem
like subjective, anecdotal summaries by individuals based on others' data and
interpretation, plus their own experience/opinion/agenda. I think you must
break the question down into manageable chunks and do your best to find
answers that you believe are honest. Are you interested in the arts economy?
Or the impact of new media on professional performers in the future? The
paucity of music provision in schools? Widening participation and its
implications for classical music? These are three (of many) key issues you
could look at but all could merit a book which would be out of date by the
time of publication because things are moving so fast."
So to follow Sandow's suggestion of, in a blog, approaching the question of classical music's future "all in little pieces, following thoughts wherever they lead", is as good a method as any for such a vast topic. It is up-to-the-minute, highly diverse and, crucially, can be a rapid meeting of minds across continents and across different fields of musical expertise.
For example, Scott's "little piece for the moment" is that "the current division between classical music and popular music will continue to blur, creating a new aesthetic or musical language that will be the basis for the next generation of art and popular musics." This comment has got me thinking about an aspect of classical music, namely the contrast between the situation Scott describes in the States (Alex Ross blogs similarly: see his post "The End of Music") and that I know about in Britain. Certainly when I was in New York in 1998 I was keenly aware of this, working with Kitty Brazleton and the Hildegurls. There's also a strong sense of fusion and avant-garde musics in Berlin particularly and Germany generally, backed up by the score Friedemann Schmidt-Mechau has written for me. But in the UK I am less aware sucessfully of crossing the classical divide. There are commercially driven, artistically dishonest attempts at "crossover" music, where violinists play in wet T-shirts and wind trios have moody unsmiling arty photos, and there is some ultra-beard-stroking contemporary music supported by the Park Lane Group and the Huddersfield festival, but there is not the same multi-referential, successful genre-bending activity that I have enjoyed abroad.
The follow-on to this is, of course, why not? Or, if it does exist, why don't I know about it and therefore why is a non-musician even less likely to know about it? I'll get working on a piece on this, the question of conservatism in British classical music, and will this (rather like the Major government), be its downfall?
In the meantime, hopefully someone else will feel inspired to write on this topic, and the blogging tree-leaves will reach onward and upward...